Globalization Vs. The rest of the World

With the integration of culture and nationalities, the movement of people and the adaptation of foreign behavior almost seeming like a positive concept, globalization poses as a negative one.  According to Nederveen Pieterse (2004) ‘globalization invites more controversy than consensus, and the areas of consensus are narrow by comparison to the controversies’. To myself, globalization invites both an utopian view and dystopian. A utopian view is considered a positive and inspiring view and dystopia reflecting the opposite- negative and frowned upon.


Among these so-called controversies is the worldwide domination of global media empires. It can be identified as a negative aspect and is evident in our every day life. Unknowingly, many of us have adapted to the spread of media empires, either simply buy purchasing the latest apple IPhone or securing a Facebook or Twitter account. With the strong power of the media, Pieterse (2004) states that ‘globalization involves more intensive interaction across wider space in shorter time than before’. Accroding to statistics, the average Facebook user spends 700 minutes per month on Facebook. Enough said.


As one of the many facets of globalization, information and media flows are able to upheld by global empires, at they both contribute to the supremacy of media empires. Through the wide spread and easy access to information around the world, mass media empires are free to grow and dominate, for example Rupert Murdoch and the Fox Broadcasting. Other global companies such as Apple, CocaCola McDonalds have placed themselves on the tip of the media empire iceberg, as they are recognized and experience worldwide.


With this in mind, it quick to judge the world as easily influenced, naïve and content with the control that the mass media has upon on us, hence globalization becoming a concern rather than concept and matter of life. Many could argue that globalization encourages the uncontrollable and forceful flow of information, culture and capitalism. Peitrese (2004) addresses a radical view, stating that ‘globalization means the onset of a borderless world’ It would be hard to believe ten years ago, that it was socially acceptable to be on your smart phone mid conversation, Facebook and Twitter replaced face to face interaction and it was possible to be aware of the news to a global extent. Goes to show how dominant the power of the media truly is.

From this we are ask ourselves the question, is globalization controllable?

Image source:

Reference:  Nederveen Pieterse, J 2004, ‘Globalization: consensus and controversies’, Globalization and culture: global mélange, Rowan & Littlefield, Lanham, Md., pp. 7–21

Statistic reference:


2 thoughts on “Globalization Vs. The rest of the World

  1. Chloe!
    Your post really got me thinking. Globalisation is quite exciting, but it’s so scary how so few corporate identities, and their affiliations, control the whole world. Multinational corporations and media entities are not of and about themselves, they influence and have a say in every aspect of life (even ours!). Like you said, we are technological zombies. I am ashamed of how addicted I am to stuff like Facebook, it is an absolute waste of my time and I feel as if Mike Zuckerberg now owns my soul (bastard). Great work I really enjoyed reading this keep going!

  2. Hi I really enjoyed your blog. You related to theory really well and embedded your view cohesively 🙂 I agree that we have advanced so much in 10 years however that does come with disadvantages as you have explained. Well Done.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s